Reviewer Selection Process and Guidelines

  1. Subject Expertise: Reviewers must demonstrate advanced knowledge in the manuscript’s field through publications or relevant experience.

  2. Academic Background: A postgraduate qualification, preferably a Ph.D. or equivalent, in a related discipline is required.

  3. Research Credentials: Individuals with established publication records in reputable journals are prioritized.

  4. Professional Standing: Reviewers should belong to recognized academic or research institutions or possess comparable industry research expertise.

  5. Conflict-of-Interest Screening: Any personal, financial, or academic conflicts must be declared.

  6. Prior Review Experience: Experience in peer review or editorial roles is preferred.

  7. Time Commitment: Reviewers must be able to provide a thorough and timely evaluation.

  8. Ethical Compliance: Reviewers are expected to uphold confidentiality and ethical standards in accordance with COPE and journal policies.

Reviewer Guidelines – Do’s

  • Maintain full confidentiality.

  • Offer objective, constructive, and evidence-based feedback.

  • Provide detailed comments covering strengths and weaknesses.

  • Meet agreed deadlines.

  • Report any conflicts of interest promptly.

  • Evaluate content independently of author identity.

  • Use professional and respectful language.

  • Report ethical concerns such as plagiarism or data issues.

Reviewer Don’ts

  • Do not disclose manuscript content.

  • Do not communicate directly with authors.

  • Do not cause avoidable delays.

  • Do not use unpublished data for personal gain.

  • Avoid biased judgments.

  • Do not delegate the review without permission.

  • Do not focus solely on minor errors.

  • Avoid hostile or personal remarks.

Reviewer Acknowledgment

High-performing reviewers may be recognized annually. All reviewers must adhere to COPE’s Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.